Sample of 65 B Certificates
65 B CERTIFICATE
We at Digital Task Force provide 65 B Certificate along with Hash Value Report to Legal Professionals, Law Enforcement Agencies, Practitioners & End Users which include:
1. Audio Transcript
2. Video Transcript
3. Email Conversations
4. Facebook, WhatsApp Conversations
5. Social Media & Apps Conversations
6. Hash Value Report
7. Expert Witness
8. Testimony Service
In this era of global access, no professional can afford the abscond from the need for a legit digital evidence report. The need for such shall always be on their itinerary while standing before the followings:
- Court of Law
- Ombudsman Forum [For Financial Fraud]
- Law Enforcement Agencies
- Land Disputes
- Online Frauds & Disputes
- Family Disputes
- Adjudicating Officers
- Others
65 B CERTIFICATE & HASH VALUE REPORTS
Digital Task Force does mobile data extraction to soft copy/print documents such as SMS, WhatsApp Chats, other media, and locations for keeping Electronic Evidence’s Authenticity intact. Data or Information can be also retrieved from locked phones, non-bootable phones, broken displays, and deleted data from phones-memory drives on basis of the condition of the device. We also do Audio/Video transcripts from Audio/Video/CCTV Footage. As per the Client’s requirement, we can provide 65 B Certificates & Hash Value Reports as per Indian Evidence Act 65B for Electronic Evidence.
65 B Certificate
Statements alone can be proved by ‘certificate’ under S. 65 B(4)
- The statements (such as e-mail, call records of phones, and bank account statements) alone can be admitted in evidence under S. 65B, through a ‘certificate’ provided under S. 65B(4).
- Sec. 65B(2) conditions are to be satisfied for ADMISSIBILITY; and not authenticity. Sec. 65B(4) alone deals with authenticity/proof; because it is laid down that the certificate “shall be evidence of any(?) matter stated” therein.
Presumption as to correctness of the copy or print-out ‘produced by a computer’ under S. 65B(5)(c).
S. 65B(5)(c) lays down a presumption as to correctness (not truth) of the computer out-put, inasmuch as S. 65B(5)(c) lays down that ‘a computer out-put shall be taken to have been produced by a computer’.
