.webp)
In a landmark ruling that could redefine India’s digital economy, the Madras High Court, in Rhutikumari v. Zanmai Labs Pvt. Ltd. (WazirX), has officially recognized cryptocurrency as “property” under Indian law. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh held that crypto assets—though not “currency” in the traditional sense—qualify as virtual digital assets (VDA) capable of ownership, transfer, and trust holding.
This judgment firmly places India within the global mainstream of digital asset jurisprudence — aligning with key rulings from New Zealand (Ruscoe v. Cryptopia, 2020) and the United Kingdom (AA v. Persons Unknown, 2019)
The case involved Rhutikumari, an investor who held 3,532 XRP coins on the WazirX exchange, valued at approximately ₹9.56 lakh. Following a massive cyberattack in 2024 that compromised WazirX’s wallets, her account was frozen. Seeking protection of her assets, she approached the Madras High Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
The Court directed WazirX to furnish a ₹9.56 lakh bank guarantee — a first in Indian crypto litigation — recognizing her holdings as legally protectable property.
The Court clarified that cryptocurrency, though intangible, satisfies the legal definition of “property”:
“It is capable of being enjoyed and possessed (in a beneficial form) and held in trust.”This interpretation draws from Article 300A of the Indian Constitution, protecting the right to property, and extends existing concepts to virtual digital assets.
Platforms like WazirX are now recognized as custodians or fiduciaries, owing duties of care and trust to users—akin to how banks or brokers handle client funds.
Even though the WazirX agreement referenced Singapore arbitration, the Court held that Indian assets (crypto holdings) could be protected under Indian jurisdiction, following PASL Wind Solutions v. GE Power Conversion (2021).
The ruling harmonizes the RBI’s cautious regulatory stance (from Internet and Mobile Association of India v. RBI, 2020) with Article 19(1)(g) — the constitutional right to trade.Crypto, the Court affirmed, cannot be outright banned merely because it is new or complex.
In a philosophical yet pragmatic turn, Justice Venkatesh invoked the Vedic concept “Neti Neti” (not this, not that), describing crypto as something that defies rigid categorization—neither currency nor commodity, but a new form of virtual property.
By doing so, the Court acknowledged the technological and economic reality of blockchain-based assets — bringing judicial clarity to what was once dismissed as “just code.”
Your digital assets—Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFTs, stablecoins—are now legally recognized property under Indian law, entitled to protection.
They must maintain trust-based custody, implement robust cybersecurity, and cannot dilute user rights through foreign restructuring or “socialization” of losses.
The judgment strengthens India’s stance that crypto can coexist with financial stability — paving the way for policy frameworks rather than prohibition.
This decision aligns India with leading global jurisdictions:
India is no longer a bystander—it’s a participant in shaping digital asset jurisprudence.
The Madras High Court’s recognition of crypto as property is not merely a legal milestone—it’s a technological awakening.
It bridges the gap between code and constitution, innovation and legality, empowering both investors and innovators in India’s growing Web3 ecosystem. Crypto is no longer “invisible wealth.”
It’s property, protected by courts, governed by fiduciary duty, and grounded in India’s constitutional philosophy of economic freedom.
© 2026 Digital Task Force (ISO-9001 : 2015 & ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Certified)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)